Supreme Court Allows Extension for Mail-In Ballots in Pennsylvania Order provides win for Democrats in battleground state The Vote-by-Mail Debate, Explained
Supreme Court Allows Extension for Mail-In Ballots in Pennsylvania
Order provides win for Democrats in battleground state
The Vote-by-Mail Debate, Explained
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
UP NEXT
0:00 / 5:452:21
The Vote-by-Mail Debate, Explained
The Vote-by-Mail Debate, Explained
With the potential resurgence of the coronavirus in the fall of 2020, many are questioning how they will vote in November without jeopardizing their health. Some lawmakers are calling for universal voting by mail, while others are saying it’s not worth the risk. WSJ explains. Photo: Jason Redmond/AFP
By Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall
Updated Oct. 19, 2020 9:10 pm ET
PRINT
TEXT
222
WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court on Monday refused to disturb a ruling by Pennsylvania’s highest court that extended the battleground state’s deadline for accepting mail-in ballots, a win for Democrats that gives voters more time to navigate postal delays and avoid in-person voting.
Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s three liberal members to leave intact a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision extending by three days the time for receipt of absentee ballots and allowing those with illegible postmarks to be counted if...
Comments
Post a Comment